Analyses the ways American leaders have justified the use of military tribunals, the suspension of due process, and the elimination of habeas corpus. The author examines the major legal cases that show how various generations have represented the need for military tribunals, and how officials historically have applied the term "necessity."
Prenumerera på vårt nyhetsbrev för att få fantastiska erbjudanden och inspiration för din nästa läsning.
Genom att registrera dig accepterar du vår personuppgiftspolicy.